Model answers for Cambridge IELTS Book 16 Task 2 Essays. Learn from my model answers so that you can get the score you need. Written by Mike Wattie, IELTS examiner and author.
In some countries, more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in.
What are the reasons for this?
How can people research this question?
In many nations, people have an increasing fascination with learning about the background of their place of residence. This essay discusses some of the motives for this as well as how people can unearth this kind of information.
There are two main reasons for this phenomenon. The primary one is due to concern over potential building problems. By examining past records of one’s place of abode the structural soundness of the building can be determined. Moreover, many people like to verify that high-quality building materials were used. Another factor is due to curiosity. Many people wonder about who has lived in their house in the past and delight over the potential discovery of previous occupancy by a famous person.
There are many methods to discover the history of a building. The most effective one is to check public records. From these records we are able to determine who the building was built by and blueprints of the structural integrity of the construction. Another effective method is to simply ask neighbours. In many cases, neighbours have been living in the area for a long time and have a wealth of information. Furthermore, houses in the same neighbourhood often share many characteristics.
In conclusion, the main reasons why people are interested in discovering the background of their places of residence is due to concern over the structural soundness of the premises as well as a natural curiosity. The best ways to find out this information are to search public records or simply ask around the neighbourhood.
In their advertising, businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way.
Why is this?
Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Companies often advertise their merchandise as having novel features. The reason for this is that product differentiation is often critical to convincing consumers to purchase. This is a progressive development as it leads to more informed consumers.
The motivation for commercials to highlight product innovations is to persuade consumers to purchase the featured products. By communicating the unique features of a product consumers may be convinced to purchases it. This is because they will see the featured product as being better than others. For instance, every time Apple releases a new version of their I-phone the new features of it are clearly articulated to potential purchasers. This highlights the value that can be derived from upgrading your phone to the latest version of the Apple brand, which increases the likelihood of a purchase.
This is phenomenon is highly beneficial to consumers as they become more informed shoppers. By having the information about a products unique and novel features savvy consumers are able to make product comparisons and choose the exact product that best suits their unique circumstances. For instance, I purchased an I-phone 12 because I saw that it has the highest camera resolution of all phones currently available. As an amateur photographer, the purchase of this phone ensures that I can take the best photos possible with a smartphone, and this feature was well worth the high price tag to me.
In conclusion, companies are choosing to advertise the new features of their products as a way of convincing shoppers to purchase their products. This is a highly constructive phenomenon as it is leading to more informed consumers who are making better purchasing decisions.
Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar, which causes many health problems. Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar.
Do you agree or disagree?
Many people believe that food and beverages that are high in sugar should be sold at high prices to discourage people from consuming these unhealthy products. I totally disagree because I think that it is unfair to consumers charge more for these products and also because there are other more effective ways to discourage consumption of these types of goods.
The main reason why I believe these products should not be made more expensive is that it is unfair to shoppers. These types of goods, when consumed in moderation, are not a health risk and therefore it does not seem reasonable that everybody who consumes these goods should have to pay more. Furthermore, for people on a tight budget, a sweet snack is an affordable luxury. However, if prices are hiked this might put people’s favourite snack out of reach.
In addition, there are more effective ways to decrease the consumption of sugary goods. The best way is for the government to engage in public service advertising to educate the public about the need to eat these types of products in moderation. This type of approach has been useful with other vices such as alcohol and cigarettes and so it seems reasonable that it will also work for sugary products. Another effective way to decrease the consumption is to ban advertising of these types of products. I feel this will be effective because it will create less of a psychological desire to consume these types of goods.
In conclusion, I am totally against increasing the price of confectionery. This is because it is not fair to consumers and there are better ways to reduce consumption of these sugary goods.
In the future all cars, buses, and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles would be passengers.
Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages?
Technological advances are leading towards all vehicles becoming automated and not having a driver. I believe the merits of this far exceed the drawbacks.
The main benefit of this phenomenon is the increase in safety. The absence of a driver means that human error can be totally eliminated. More precisely, car accidents will no longer result from a lapse of concentration or poor judgment in the operation of a vehicle. For example, there will no longer be an issue with intoxicated drivers getting behind the wheel and endangering themselves and others on the road.
In addition, it will be more enjoyable for all occupants of a vehicle as no one will have to perform driving duties. People who would have been drivers can now relax during a journey. For instance, they will be able to watch movies or interact with their friends on social media while travelling. Furthermore, the stress of a long drive can be avoided, meaning that they can arrive at the destination in a more relaxed state.
However, there are likely to be cyber-criminals who will attempt to take advantage of this situation. Hackers may seize control of these vehicles and use them for their own nefarious purposes. For example, a hacker could use an automated vehicle as a getaway vehicle or to block traffic in order to evade the police. Even worse, they could hack into police vehicles rendering them useless in a chase.
In conclusion, I believe that the positives of this phenomenon greatly outweigh the negatives. This is because the increase in safety and enjoyment when travelling surpass the threat posed by cyber-criminals. Therefore, this new technology should be embraced.
Get the score you need by using my IELTS writing correction and feedback service by a trained examiner to increase your score. I check your writing tasks and give you feedback on errors and ways to improve your writing. I will also give you a score for each of the four grading criteria.
https://www.ieltsanswers.com/writing-correction-ielts.html
can you please just mark my essay and tell me the band score it falls under
In the future all cars, buses, and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles would be passengers.
Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages?
Technology is advancing at a frenzied rate. In the coming years, it is believed that humans will not be required to drive automobiles. This essay states how this advancement has more benefits than drawbacks.
The primary advantage of driverless driving is a significant decrease in accidents. As the vehicle will be driven using advanced technology, it will be better at judging and maintaining safety on the road; there will be fewer laws broken, such as crossing the speed limit, as machines are programmed to follow the rules. Tesla, an automobile company, tested driving cars without human involvement, which showed a probability of only one accident in a 10,000 km stretch. This is because machines unlikely humans do not get distracted and are very much focused on completing the task in the most convenient way.
However, along with the significant advantages of driverless vehicles, there are a few severe disadvantages. One of them is a massive loss of employment, as the system will replace the individual drivers, creating a financial strain on the families these drivers support. Additionally, there is a risk of cyber security; the system can be hacked, and the vehicles can be controlled to create a destructive situation. Huge tech companies such as Google and Meta have been hacked multiple times, even with their high security. On the contrary, the probability of this drawback is far lower when compared with all the destruction and deaths currently happening due to multiple reasons, for instance, rash driving and drunk driving.
In conclusion, with all the technological advancements and developments, machines and systems to take over driving and make roads safer for the public in future years. Although, there are drawbacks such as job replacement and risk of hacking; with all the technical progress and better security, there will be overall fewer road accidents and deaths than today.
Let’s assess the essay using the IELTS writing band descriptors for the four grading criteria: Task Achievement, Coherence and Cohesion, Lexical Resource, and Grammatical Range and Accuracy.
1. Task Achievement
The essay addresses the prompt by discussing both the advantages and disadvantages of driverless vehicles.
The opinion is clear, with a conclusion that advantages outweigh disadvantages.
While the task is generally fulfilled, there could be more depth in the argument for disadvantages, such as explaining how job losses and cyber security threats could have long-term societal effects.
Some examples, like the reference to Tesla, are relevant, but they lack sufficient detail. Additionally, the use of specific data (“one accident in a 10,000 km stretch”) could be elaborated upon to provide clearer context.
Score: Band 6.5
The response adequately addresses all parts of the task. However, some arguments lack depth, and there could be more examples or explanations to fully develop the points made.
2. Coherence and Cohesion
The essay is structured well, with a clear introduction, body paragraphs discussing advantages and disadvantages, and a conclusion.
Paragraphs are logically organized, and ideas flow fairly well, although transitions between ideas could be smoother. For example, the contrast between advantages and disadvantages could use more cohesive devices or linking phrases.
Repetition of phrases like “driverless vehicles” and “disadvantages” could be reduced by using synonyms or paraphrasing for greater variety.
Score: Band 7
The essay is logically organised and easy to follow. Cohesion is generally good, but better use of cohesive devices and variety in sentence structures could improve the flow.
3. Lexical Resource
The vocabulary used is appropriate for the topic, with words like “driverless vehicles,” “technological advancements,” and “cyber security” demonstrating an understanding of the subject.
However, there is some repetition of words and phrases, and more variety in vocabulary would improve the overall lexical range.
Some phrases are awkward, such as “machines unlikely humans” (which should be “unlike humans”) and “focused on completing the task in the most convenient way” (which could be more concise).
Score: Band 6.5
The essay demonstrates a good range of vocabulary, but there is some repetition and awkward phrasing. More sophisticated and varied vocabulary would raise the score.
4. Grammatical Range and Accuracy
The essay demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. However, some grammatical errors affect clarity, such as “machines unlikely humans” instead of “unlike humans” and “creating a destructive situation,” which could be clearer.
Tenses are generally used correctly, but there are a few minor issues that detract from the overall accuracy, such as inconsistent use of articles (“machines unlikely humans” instead of “machines, unlike humans”).
Despite the errors, the meaning is still mostly clear throughout the essay.
Score: Band 6
The essay uses a range of structures, but some errors in sentence construction, article usage, and phrasing lower the overall grammatical accuracy.
Overall Score: Band 6.5
The essay is a strong response overall, with clear ideas and a logical structure. However, there are areas where it could be improved, particularly in developing ideas more fully, improving vocabulary range, and reducing grammatical errors. With more attention to detail and a more varied approach to language, it could reach a higher band.
Sir, can you please give me an approximate band score for this essay, I do not no my level yet so your help will be greatly appreciated.
This is the prompt:
“In some countries, more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in.
What are the reasons for this?
How can people research this question?”
This is my response:
“In some parts of the world, home owners are becoming curious about the underlying history behind where they live. From my point of view, there are two prime reasons that are prone to explain this phenomenon. In this essay, I will introduce these reasons, and additionally, shed light on how people can efficiently uncover the historical background of their properties.
Firstly, I believe that simple curiosity is the key driver of this action. Admittedly, this is one of the strongest traits of human’s evolution that everybody has. Maybe homeowners had heard rumors that intrique them or they simply have a lot of free time. Moreover, this activity is not susceptible to any danger and can bring a lot of benefits.
Secondly, it is an undeniable fact that properties which contain historical backgrounds are valued higher than those without. As a result, some people, in order to increase the monetary value of their estates, had hired professionals or tried their best to conduct research. If fortunate, rare antique artifacts or even fossils can be found underneath their floors, making millions, if not billions when sold.
However, finding historical backgrounds is not as easy as it seems. From my experience, the first basic step is to consult the elders in your neighborhood. Since they are very likely to know the most, owners should start from them. Then, based on what you have gathered, further information can be found by delving into books and old records in libraries or surfing the Internet.
In conclusion, curiosity and to increase the estate’s value are two most significant reasons behind why people are trying to find out about the history of their home. On the other hand, to conduct successive research, it is advisable to seek help from the older generation before searching in other resources.”
Estimated Band Score:
Based on your current response, I would estimate it to be in the Band 6 to 6.5 range. To push this into a higher band (7+), you should aim for greater depth in explanation, more precise vocabulary, and fewer grammatical errors.
Here are the main areas for improvement:
Depth of Explanation: Expand on curiosity and monetary value with more detailed reasoning and examples.
Speculation: Avoid unrealistic examples, such as finding fossils.
Overgeneralisation: Phrases like “this activity is not susceptible to any danger” don’t add much to the argument.
Transitions: Improve the flow between ideas and avoid informal phrases like “From my experience.”
Word Choice: Incorrect or awkward choices like “intrique” (intrigue) and “human’s evolution” (human evolution).
Grammatical Issues: Inconsistent tense usage and missing articles (e.g., “two most significant reasons” should be “the two…”).
Overuse of Modals: Repeated use of “can” limits variety; consider alternatives.
Formality: Phrases like “free time” and “surfing the Internet” are informal for academic writing.
Can you please evaluate this essay as well.
All the parents want the best opportunies for their children. There are some people who think that schools should teach children skills but others think heavyarangeofsubjectsisbe erofachild’sfuture.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion
Primary debate, these days, relates to educational concerns regarding children, as every parent wants the best for their child’s future. The education system plays a vital role in the character and career-building of youngsters. In this regard, some people are of the view that, their kids must be taught professional skills in schools and colleges rather than a pile of versatile subjects, that are no longer needed in future life. While others believe that, the opposite must be practiced, to give kids a diverse platform for their careers. This essay will delve into some of the constructive and negative effects of both arguments, before reaching a conclusion.
Convincing arguments can be made that, if the students are taught a wide range of subjects at an early age, this would provide them with multiple options to choose from, for their future, according to their interests. In other words, a variety of courses will give them the opportunity to get involved in them and experience their positives and drawbacks. Moreover, the little ones get the chance to opt for something new, if they lose interest in one course. For instance, if a child has selected engineering as his future profession and for some reason, he’s unable to pursue that, then he’ll be able to switch the field only if he had any knowledge or experience regarding that other domain. Hence, this change of mind is only
possible, if one already has a previous exposure. Therefore, a versatile subject exposure will play an advantageous role in professional life.
On the contrary, there are parents, who believe that their offspring must be taught some professional expertise rather than a range of courses so that they can focus on that particular skill and pursue it as a final career. Furthermore, this straight single-vision will help them to polish their abilities. As some students lose their concentration, by getting double-minded, when exposed to multiple subjects. So, based on this particular reasoning some parents demand skilfulness as compared to irrelevant knowledge.
I concede that having diverse exposure for a child, in the early learning stage, has a constructive effect on making good choices for the future. Whereas, one-way skill teaching will limit their progress and development.
To recapitulate, according to the arguments aforementioned above, it is believed that both the arguments have their respective merits and demerits. On balance, however, the positives related to the versatilele range of subjects, in terms of multiple gateways for the future, overshadow any negatives.
Can you please check my essay and give your valuable feedback ?
Primary debate these days relates to the effects of modernisation of different technologies on society, particularly the advancements in transportation system. With the continuous progress in this field, the driverless vehicles are not far away. However, there are both pros and cons related to this, but one must bear in mind that every innovation is somehow man-driven. This essay will delve into merits and demerits of self-driven transport and its impacts on society.
One of the major advantage that the society will enjoy, will be the complete eradication of human error on roads. Consequently, there will be less accidents and more safety. This is to say that, minor mis-judgements, that were done by the drivers’ negligence due to a lot of reasons, such as using mobile phones, lack of concentration or excessive alcohol intake, will no longer be a problem. Therefore, with driverless cars, this factor will be eliminated, ensuring improvement in road safety.
Another positive of this innovation is the solution to man-power shortage, specially drivers. As a result, no extra staff will be required in homes and offices for this particular purpose. Moreover, stress associated with long distance travel will also be combated, as one can enjoy a fresh and relaxing journey. In addition, privacy will also be maintained during trips.
In contrast, this development will cause a lot of unemployment in the society, as majority of the people are drivers in our society. As a consequence, this will further burden the nation in different respects.
Another striking demerit associated with self-driven vehicles is the technical glitch. To be more precise, any error in programming of a vehicle can lead to accidents and pose a serious threat to passengers and pedestrians. This makes it a risky advancement.
To sum up, elimination of human-error, less man-power, engineering fault and rise in unemployment, one can conclude that both merits and demerits have their respective consequences. On balance, however, advantages overshadows disadvantages in terms of safety and relaxation.
Overall Suggested Band Score: 6.5
The essay is generally effective but could benefit from further development of ideas, more precise language use, and increased grammatical accuracy. With some refinement, particularly in addressing the areas noted, this essay has the potential to achieve a higher score.
1. it could be clearer in the introduction that you think “the merits surpass the drawbacks”
2. There are several grammatical errors, including article misuse (“one of the major advantage” instead of “advantages”), verb tense agreement (“advantages overshadows”), and minor punctuation issues. These errors slightly hinder clarity and impact the overall accuracy.
It has been seen that, in several nations, individuals are getting more curious about the history of the home or building they move into. This essay will discuss the rationale behind it along with ways to dig up past history.
The major reason behind this notion is to find out whether a building in good condition to live in. In order to determine the soundness of any home or building, one has to check what kind of material was used for the construction and whether it provides safety against some natural calamities, such as earthquakes. Another reason behind this trend is to find out if the building has any potential threat from some unwanted people, and that could be a potential reason why the previous owners are selling it. Also, more often than not, people are just curious to find out whether any famous personalities lived in the house, and that could somehow make them feel good about it.
There are several methods to dig up the past of a building. To begin with, the best way is to contact the local council, look into the records of previous ownership, and find out more about the building. Additionally, if an individual can get in touch with the builder who built the house, they could gain some meaningful insights about the building.
To conclude, people often end up finding history in order to understand whether the house is liveable and provides a sound environment for their loved ones; sometimes they are just curious about finding out about it. The best ways to find out the history are by getting to know about the previous owners or tenants; they could also contact the construction companies that built the house or building.
Excellent essay; except, it could be greatly improved by writing more for paragraph 3.
I would like to see at least two sentences for each of your main ideas.
I’m giving it 7.5 overall sue to a 7 fo TR due to this issue.
“dig up” is ok; but its better to NOT repeat it…you could have “unearth”
Thank you for sharing these Cambridge 16 essays answers! I found them incredibly helpful in preparing for my own IELTS exam. Your explanations and samples are very clear and concise, and I appreciate the time and effort you put into creating this resource. I’m sure it will be a great asset for many IELTS candidates. Keep up the good work!
You are most welcome and more model answers here:
https://www.ieltsanswers.com/ielts-writing-model-answers-band-9.html
In many nations, people are developing craze to know about the history of place they live in. The current essay discusses few reasons behind this phenomenon.
There are two main reasons for this phenomenon. As we all know, human nature is full of curiosity. So, everyone who live in a house wants to know about the history of it. However, there are multiple reasons against such otidid. First one is, different problems they are facing always tend them to inquire about the oldness of their place of residence and what are the causes of those issues. Secondly, firmness of building is another strong rational, about which residents are highly concerned. They really want to know the potential of structure and its reliability. People also wonder about has lived in this building before them and what were their experiences related to the place.
There are many methods to discover above mentioned curiosities. Firstly, people can check the history of building in public records. In this way they are able to know who built this building and all other confusions related to the potential soundness of building. Secondly, the most easiest way to inquire is, they can ask neighbors whatever information they want to seek about building.
In conclusion, the primary reason why most people are concerned about background of building they live in is because they are much concerned over the soundness of structure of building and it’s out of natural curiosity. the best way to unearth this information is to ask neighbors or to search public records of the building.
kindly check and give me feedback. thanks
You got 6.5 in this.
I am ex-examiner and checker of writing tasks
please evaluate my eassy
People in most of the countries are more curious in researching about the history of their buildings or house were they plan to live in. The most obvious reasons are either they are curious about their new surroundings or they may have few concerns on the building.
So in major countries people move from a place to another place for their various personal reasons so when people are searching for a building or house in a new place and when they found a suitable place so one of reason is out of curiosity a few concerns will be raised and the first thing most people do is asking their neighbours about the history building or house and ask about the people who lived before. This is one of the way to know about the building or house.
But when people are far from that place and we can only shift to a new place when we are completely sure about our decision, in that type of case we can access to government records which are available and we can access with ease with our current technology while living in our place. By using these records one can decide whether is the building is constructed with good materials so that they get to know that they can live in that house or building safely without any concern.
In conclusion people try to know about the history of the building or house because either they are eager to now their surroundings or it may be out of security concerns and the best way to know about history of the building or house is either talk to the neighbours or by accessing the public records of the building.
Around band 6
1. You introduction does not introduce both questions
2. Do not start sentences with conjunctions like “so” “but”…and definitely do not start paragraphs with them.
3. know in the following phrase “eager to now their surroundings ”
IELTS writing correction and feedback service by Mike Wattie, an ex-examiner, to increase your score
https://www.ieltsanswers.com/writing-correction-ielts.html
16 task 4 writing 2
Technology innovation has brought benefit to our daily life. In the coming decades, all vehicles will be driven remotely without drivers. In my point of view, the upsides of driverless transportation can overtake the downsides.
This strategy can effectively save time to those depends on travelling with their private cars. For workers who need to work cross the region could use those time spending on driving on other meaningful activity, which could help them to spare their hands to deal with personal stuff or have meeting with clients, possibly leading to profit making and success at work. In addition, tourists who like to have road trip could free their hands to have more valuable time with their accompany, so as to admire the views passing by.
On the other hand, some argue that remote vehicles may lower the living standard of drivers. Replacing by artificial intelligence, the previous drivers will become unemployed, which means they no longer have a stable salary to support their living. However, as the government has cut down the cost of hiring public transports’ driver, this could lead to saving the expenses for allocating resources to other major social crisis, such as build more public housing and provide subsidize for needy to support their living satisfactory. This trend would bring merits to people in other way.
In conclusion, when automatic transport is imposed in the future, it would save public’s time cost whereas leading to a lost of living standard. Fortunately, the impact could be diminished by some government policy, ultimately, maximize the cost effectiveness.
16 task 3 writing 2
The obesity rate in the world is rapidly increasing. Some diseases are caused by consuming too much sugar in their food or drink. Some state that the price of sugary products should increase owing to reduce the consumption of sugar. I strongly agree with this statement as it can effectively diminish people’s desire to consume sweets, also could probably reduce the amount of the supply of sweet products.
First of all, the desire to eat desserts may decrease. When the cost to consume desserts are dramatically grew, it may become unaffordable to some individual while they are not able to buy sugary food but can only choose some healthy and cheap food. A case in point is that the American government imposes a Fat tax on all sugary product, by increasing 50% from the original price. In addition, Americans considerably control the frequency on buying sweets. When the price is no longer appealing to people, they will turn their appetite to other food. Ultimately, this is a successful way to control the consumption of unhealthy products.
As for the food companies, they may lower the supply on food which contain sugar if the price of sugary products are restricted by government. From an economic point of views, when the demand decrease, the supply will eventually decrease due to the company do not want to be in the red. Therefore, when the sweets products option is decreased, people may grow a new diet habit with only consuming sufficient amount of sugar. Ultimately, people will not depend on sweets but organic products instead.
In conclusion, it is obviously can control the sugar intake of people by the booming price of sugary products while people will choose healthier food rather than candy and the sugar factory may decline the production of sugar.
I will point out three mistakes. If you want a complete edit please use my writing service.
For details about my writing service please refer to the link below:
https://www.ieltsanswers.com/writing-correction-ielts.html
1. Some diseases are caused by consuming = Some diseases are caused by PEOPLE consuming
2. also could probably reduce the amount of the supply of sweet products = also IT could probably reduce the amount of the supply of sweet products
3. “A case in point” makes it seem like the tax is ALREADY imposed, but it is not
3. paragraph 3 I cant see why people are going for organic products; it seems it is just not sugary products…they might have a glass of ornage juice, but it does not mean the oranges are organic.
overall 6
There is no denying the fact that today’s vehicles including cars, trucks and buses will be automatically driven by computers in the following years, without seeking help from humans. While it is a commonly held belief that these vehicles will have certain benefits that outweigh it drawbacks, there is an argument that opposes it. In my perspective, I believe that the advantages of this phenomenon will exceed it’s disadvantages.
To commence, there are numerous undeniable benefits comprising today’s topic. First of all, implementing this system in vehicles will foster the economy of several developed nations. In other words, governments and authorities will alleviate their expenses on public transportation systems by saving the salaries and wages of drivers. Evidence for this appears in both Norway and Denmark. Both nation’s authorities cooperated with Volvo, a japanese brand that manufacture driverless cars and buses, to send approximately 10,000 vehicles to both countries in order to utilize them in the transportation system of both countries.
Moreover, although these type of vehicles will incur a high cost, it will ensure convenience and relaxation for individuals and passengers. In addition, individuals who posses such cars will save both time and effort. This is because individuals will not experience the complexity of driving. It is also possible to say that this type of vehicle will not emit greenhouse gases in comparison to nowadays cars and buses. Hence, it will reflect on the environment, climate change and deforestation in a positive way.
In conclusion, despite people having different views, I believe authorities must ensure steps are taken to implement this phenomenon as soon as possible.
learned new point from all of these
Thanks
In order to use these model answers most effectively I suggest you follow this process:
read the task instructions
think about how you would respond to these instructions
read my model answer and see if you were right!
More models here:
https://www.ieltsanswers.com/ielts-writing-model-answers-band-9.html
It is expected that in the near future conveyance by all means of
transports is about to be hold by Al technologies and commuters will
be able to use them without any drivers. This essay will demonstrate
how self-driving vehicles could provide improvements in society but
will also show that it can lead unemployement.Whilist acknowledging
that there are drawbacks, I believe that the merits of driverless
transports surpasses its demerits
As the technologies being developed in the recent decades, huge
number of innovations which have many advantages are being
introducesed to the society, the one is autonomous cars.First and
foremost they creates comfortability to the public with quick and easy
transportation. For instance a person can order a taxi in advance
simply by using his phone and it saves his time.Secondly after the
replacement of all vehicles from nonautonomous into self-driving
ones, the traffic starts to be managed systematically by Al
technologies, causing to the increase in safety level and this leads to
prevention of many lives.In 2019 a group of inventors tried this
method in a little town of California state and study showed that it
works perfectly.
On the other hand development of driverless transports results job
loss in many working areas such as taxi, bus driver and driving
instructors.It is obvious that nowdays there are thousands of people
working in those fields and the development of vehicles could result
to the increase of poverty among public.This change can be the core
of several other problems,for instance rise of crime rates lack of
education for the children of poor families and etc.
In conclusion,when the expectation about future transports becomes
reality it can lead to many positive changes in society including better
security and prevention of traffic congestions and also some small
disadvantages could be seen such as job loss.
I have a paid service if you want to use that and get full feedback
https://www.ieltsanswers.com/writing-correction-ielts.html
For free corrections all I’m willing to do is find three errors.
1. Transport is uncountable
2. The last sentence of the introduction is messy and you could just write something along the lines of “This essay discusses why the merits of self-driving vehicles outweigh the drawbacks”
3. The first sentence of paragraph 2 is unnecessarily long and has about three errors in it. Just write a clear and concise sentence like
“There are many benefits of self-driving vehicles”
My IELTS exam is on 17th of February and I am struggling mainly for writing task 2 as well as task 1 especially map and processed diagram.
I am afraid that I will stuck at 5.5 . Please help out me for this.
1. see my suggestions on this page:
https://www.ieltsanswers.com/preparing-ielts-test.html
2. download my free ebook here and see model answers for those tasks
https://www.ieltsanswers.com/free-ielts-test-preparation-book.html
3. if you can get your writing corrected by me:
https://www.ieltsanswers.com/writing-correction-ielts.html
thank you so much. I’m a biginner for IELTS test. and struggling with writing. your templete will be a great sours.
Thanks